談Offer的藝術：在求職博弈中尋找平衡與價值
每個人在求職的過程當中，一定會遇到一個最重要的事情-談Offer。 在經過多方廝殺，面試多場之後，終於拿到了Offer，往往就像通宵打遊戲終於來到最終Boss關一樣興奮，總是想取得最後漂亮的勝利，拿到最豐盛的寶物。然而，許多人對這個過程存在誤解，認為這是一場爭取最高薪資的競賽。事實上，成功的Offer談判遠比這種簡單化的理解要複雜得多。今天我們將探討如何用正確穩定的觀念和心態來談Offer，既維護自身利益，又能建立良好的職場關係，同時找到最適合自己的職業機會，不讓自己後悔。 重新定義談Offer的本質...
除了「CrowdStrike到底有沒有做測試？」之外，你更應該思考的是這6個軟體測試思維問題
2024年7月19日， CrowdStrike公司的更新引發的全球微軟Windows大規模當機事件，網路上在討論什麼？發現討論的焦點主要集中在以下幾個方面:開發者的軟體測試思維、分階段上線策略的缺失、軟體測試的必要性與局限性、敏捷開發與軟體測試的關係、自動化測試的爭議，但其實根本原因在流程！而不是測試！
「一日測試，終身測試」的正確解讀
註冊會員，取得Armoury測試管理系統的免費培訓課程 我們的Ticket Based Program跑了一段時間了，我們收到了很多人在軟體測試的相關問題，因此誕生了這個企劃，QA Q&A，當我們收到一些有趣的問題，不涉及企業機密的，我們就會考慮做成影片，放在官網上跟大家分享。 這次第一集就是要來討論一句老話: 一日測試終身測試是不是真的？這廢話啊，當然是真的啊，只是看你怎麼解讀而已。...
撰寫履歷要避開的六大陷阱，否則別想拿到面試機會
我們探討撰寫履歷時必須避開的六大常見錯誤，這些錯誤阻礙你獲得面試機會。從解釋空窗期的重要性、避免過強調過去的成就，到如何確保你的履歷既清晰又具針對性，每一點都是基於豐富的面試經驗和人才招聘實踐。還強調了履歷更新的重要性以及為何過分依賴Cover letter是個錯誤。此外，文章提供了具體建議，從而提高被邀請面試的機率。本文的實用建議都將助你避開讓你失去面試機會的履歷陷阱。
The New Chapter in Software Testing Courses – Tickets Based Program
KEENLITY is launching its innovative ‘Tickets Based Program’ for software testing, a unique blend of self-directed learning and professional guidance. This software testing course aims to enhance learning efficiency and provide precise learning directions while reducing time costs. Subscribers of the ‘Tickets System’ can pose questions about personal learning, software testing, Python development, and receive immediate, personalized responses from experienced professionals. Additionally, the program emphasizes balancing self-study with practical experience to aid students in advancing in the field of software testing.
軟體測試課程的新篇章 – Tickets Based Program
KEENLITY鋒測科技正推出其創新的「Tickets Based Program」軟體測試課程，這是一種基於自主學習與專業指導相結合的指導模式。該計劃旨在提高學習效率，確保學生獲得精準的學習方向，同時減少時間成本。透過訂閱「Tickets System」，用戶可以提出有關個人學習、軟體測試、Python開發等問題，並從經驗豐富的專業人士那裡獲得即時且個性化的回答。此外，該計劃還特別強調在自學和實踐經驗之間取得平衡，幫助學生在軟體測試領域取得進步。
ChatGPT Replacing Software Testing Engineers? Address These 3 Issues First
Remember the first blog topic about 'The Essence of Software Testing'? After nearly a year, I have a preliminary answer: "Avoiding Risk". The fundamental reason for not testing is choosing to 'accept the risk'. Can't test everything? Release as is due to fixed project...
8 Reasons Why Excel or Google Sheets Should Not Be Used as a Test Case Management System
If we were to talk about the most popular Test Case Management Systems, Excel and Google Sheets might come second and third. Ironically, the first place is held by 'not having any testing at all,' which means no need for test management. This isn't a joke. We surveyed...
QA 2.0 – Soc-Psy Testing, An Approach to Clarify Issues
QA 2.0, Soc-Psy Testing. we delve into the journey of Fabian, a software testing engineer grappling with the recurring challenge of incomplete testing despite working in a well-staffed team. His quest for answers leads him to explore a variety of technical resources, yet he struggles to address the core issue. This narrative highlights a common pitfall in the tech industry: a technical fix mentality that often overlooks the human and social factors critical to project success. The story also sheds light on the misuse of agile methodologies in businesses, where rapid iteration is misaligned with actual employee capabilities, leading to unrealistic targets and high turnover. The excerpt invites readers to rethink problem-solving approaches, emphasizing a holistic analysis that considers underlying causes beyond immediate technical solutions.
QA 2.0 – 會心派測試，釐清問題的新思路
QA 2.0，也就是會心派測試。在軟體測試的世界中，Fabian作為一名軟體測試工程師，面臨著一個困惑：為何總是無法完成測試。在一個人員眾多的測試團隊中，他發現問題不僅僅是技術層面的。通過他的故事，我們發現，在技術導向的思維中，往往忽略了與人相關的社會學、心理學和經濟學等因素。這一點在他的面試經歷中表露無遺，揭示了當前科技業中敏捷和Scrum方法的誤用，以及如何對待工作效率和離職率問題的狹隘看法。此故事引導讀者思考，解決問題需要深入分析背後的真正原因，而非僅僅追求表面的指標。
